Claude Opus called out my feedback as "GPT-flavoured encouragement"

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1rwxo65/claude_opus_called_out_my_feedback_as/"> <img src="https://preview.redd.it/aexa59vdfrpg1.jpeg?width=640&amp;crop=smart&amp;auto=webp&amp;s=3f991d0253f479ff0ec1c0cdefb7b0895dc44c1c" alt="Claude Opus called out my feedback as &quot;GPT-flavoured encouragement&quot;" title="Claude Opus called out my feedback as &quot;GPT-flavoured encouragement&quot;" /> </a> </td><td> <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Been working on REPuLse — a browser-based live coding instrument with a custom Lisp, ClojureScript pattern engine, and Rust/WASM audio synthesis. Yesterday I was comparing it to Klangmeister to think through what we&#39;re doing differently.</p> <p>I had Claude Opus helping me analyse the project, and at some point I pasted in some feedback. Opus immediately flagged it:</p> <p>&quot;The tone reads like GPT being encouraging. &#39;Great call highlighting this!&#39; — that&#39;s filler.&quot;</p> <p>...the thing is, that feedback was from Grok, not ChatGPT. 😂</p> <p>Honestly Opus wasn&#39;t wrong about the filler — but the cross-AI shade was unexpected. First time I&#39;ve seen one model roast another (wrongly identified) model&#39;s writing style. The rest of the analysis was genuinely sharp though.</p> </div><!-- SC_ON --> &#32; submitted by &#32; <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/LowerRefrigerator415"> /u/LowerRefrigerator415 </a> <br/> <span><a href="https://i.redd.it/aexa59vdfrpg1.jpeg">[link]</a></span> &#32; <span><a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1rwxo65/claude_opus_called_out_my_feedback_as/">[comments]</a></span> </